Caecilia, Lana and Rose in One Two Three

Photos by Oleg released on Jun 21, 2008

Member Rating

This Photo Set

(59 votes)

Caecilia

Lana

Rose

Your Rating

This Photo Set

Caecilia

Lana

Rose

Feel free to express your thoughts, feelings or ideas, but please do it in a fair and friendly manner - not only when commenting on the models, but also when responding to fellow contributors. Thank you.

Member

I AGREE! GIVE US BACK ONE GIRL AT A TIME!!!

reply

Member

Oleg is a genius. What a fantastic Photoset. Simple but incredible. Three very beautiful girl's having fun. I'm speechless.

reply

Member

Oh I wish I was there... Can I join in please...???

reply

Member

Wow, what an incredible ass the girl on the left has. They are all nice but her ass really sticks out, kind of like the huge bulge in my pants. Oh my.......

reply

Member

Looks like a flesh sandwich, so many flavors.

reply

Member

Brilliant photo set. 3 very lovely little ladies. Lots of body contact and touching going on. Very erotic and stimulating.

reply

Member

Three is too many.

reply

Member

I think 3 is too many as well. Some of the recent two-girl shoots have been quiet erotic but this goes nowhere. Hot women but not going to do much for the audience or themselves

reply

Member

I agree with Teuthis! Three is too many!

reply

Member

Dear Femjoy , Three hearts are better than one ... [ cue lounge music ] ... no but seriously , very nice - and a bit more risque and decadent than usual , no ? Fear not , Athos likes. Which brings me back to yesterday's "dead horse" and my hair-brained scheme on how to address it. The last thing I want is for Femjoy to lose members - even the whiny labiaphobes - so to expand on my "ratings" idea , here is an addendum for your "Geek Squad" [ and mind you , I've met enough geeks to know they are surely on my side here ] ...supposing that next time you upgrade the website , you created a "member friendly" search feature - one that enables members to hone in on the kind of photo-gallery they are most interested in ? The danger here is that of making a classy website look like a "meat market" , so words and packaging are very important. For example , categories of setting would be a good start. i.e. do you want to see an outdoor shoot ? ...an indoor shoot ? ...should it be a beach , a forest , a boudoir ? Do you want to see "classic nudes" or do you want something more "romantic" , or perhaps more "explicit" , or more "artistic" or more "playful" in your model ? ... do you prefer a blonde , brunette or redhead - should she be thin , muscular , or voluptuous ? Think on a "map guide" and you get the idea. Aforementioned risks aside , the pay-off is that members get to focus in on what interests them specifically - thus weeding out what displeases - and VOILA - you have a happier membership. If this all sounds too cold and "market driven" , I acquiesce [ it IS ] - however , within your "core" membership there seems to be a deep divide over what passes as "Femjoy" material ... this might be a good time to diversify and think on the client's wishes - we strive for democracy after all - and the goal of democracy is to do "the most good for the most people" ... ...so why not create a "digital buffet" ?

reply

Stay Updated

For regular updates and free footage, subscribe to our newsletter!

Follow FEMJOY

Don't miss all the news and hot stuff via Twitter (@femjoy.com)