released on Jun 21, 2008
Quickview Edition 800px, 7.83 MB
Collectors Edition 1200px, 14.36 MB
Large Edition 2500px, 46.09 MB
Poster Size Edition 5500px, 109.7 MB
This Photo Set
I AGREE! GIVE US BACK ONE GIRL AT A TIME!!!
Oleg is a genius. What a fantastic Photoset. Simple but incredible. Three very beautiful girl's having fun. I'm speechless.
Oh I wish I was there...
Can I join in please...???
Wow, what an incredible ass the girl on the left has. They are all nice but her ass really sticks out, kind of like the huge bulge in my pants. Oh my.......
Looks like a flesh sandwich, so many flavors.
Brilliant photo set. 3 very lovely little ladies. Lots of body contact and touching going on. Very erotic and stimulating.
Three is too many.
I think 3 is too many as well. Some of the recent two-girl shoots have been quiet erotic but this goes nowhere. Hot women but not going to do much for the audience or themselves
I agree with Teuthis! Three is too many!
Dear Femjoy ,
Three hearts are better than one ... [ cue lounge music ] ... no but seriously , very nice - and a bit more risque and decadent than usual , no ? Fear not , Athos likes.
Which brings me back to yesterday's "dead horse" and my hair-brained scheme on how to address it.
The last thing I want is for Femjoy to lose members - even the whiny labiaphobes - so to expand on my "ratings" idea , here is an addendum for your "Geek Squad" [ and mind you , I've met enough geeks to know they are surely on my side here ]
...supposing that next time you upgrade the website , you created a "member friendly" search feature - one that enables members to hone in on the kind of photo-gallery they are most interested in ?
The danger here is that of making a classy website look like a "meat market" , so words and packaging are very important.
For example , categories of setting would be a good start. i.e. do you want to see an outdoor shoot ? ...an indoor shoot ? ...should it be a beach , a forest , a boudoir ?
Do you want to see "classic nudes" or do you want something more "romantic" , or perhaps more "explicit" , or more "artistic" or more "playful" in your model ? ... do you prefer a blonde , brunette or redhead - should she be thin , muscular , or voluptuous ?
Think on a "map guide" and you get the idea.
Aforementioned risks aside , the pay-off is that members get to focus in on what interests them specifically - thus weeding out what displeases - and VOILA - you have a happier membership.
If this all sounds too cold and "market driven" , I acquiesce [ it IS ] - however , within your "core" membership there seems to be a deep divide over what passes as "Femjoy"
material ... this might be a good time to diversify and think on the client's wishes - we strive for democracy after all - and the goal of democracy is to do "the most good for the most people" ...
...so why not create a "digital buffet" ?
For regular updates and free footage, subscribe to our newsletter!
Don't miss all the news and hot stuff via Twitter (@femjoy.com)
Enter your email address
Please add your email address.
Add your enquiries or suggestions to improve our site.
Please add your feedback.
Not a member yet?